Polski
Nie masz czasu na zapoznanie się z całością artykułu?
Wystarczy, że klikniesz ikonę „oznacz artykuł do przeczytania później”. Wszystkie zapisane publikacje znajdziesz w profilu czytelnikaThe Great Delusion – Mearsheimer, Czaputowicz, Radziejewski, Bonikowska, Jurasz
We invite you to a debate on the Polish premiere of the book by prof. John J. Mearsheimer “The Great Dellusion. Liberal Dreams and International Reality”. Are the liberals inconsistent with contemporary international politics with their theses? Are geopolitics and particular interests the only currency in contemporary international politics?
These issues were discussed with the attendance of:
- prof. John Mearsheimer – R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Chicago. An American political scientist and international relations scholar, a creator of the theory of offensive realism. Author of “The Great Dellusion” and “The Tragedy of the Politics of Powers”;
- prof. Jacek Czaputowicz – professor at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw. Former Polish minister of foreign affairs;
- dr Małgorzata Bonikowska – political scientist, university teacher and government advisor. President of the Center for International Relations and the THINTANK Foundation;
- Bartłomiej Radziejewski – president and founder of Nowa Konfederacja, director of Nowa Konfederacja Publishing House. Author of the book “Between greatness and disappearance. A thing about Poland in the 21st century”.
The debate is moderated by Witold Jurasz – Onet publicist, a former Polish diplomat.
Watch the English-language debate:
Dołącz
Zobacz
The idea of “Solidarity” has been killed in Poland after 1989. Law and Justice fills this space only rhetorically
The tragedy of Poland is that it had to conform to the demands of the international Western community. It had to become aggressively capitalist and corporatist and it could not assert its independence. Jarema Piekutowski interviews Maurice Glasman
Khanna: Just because I'm a geopolitician by education, does not mean I'm an ideologue. Conectivity today is a battlefield for influence
Is Parag Khanna the second Fukuyama? Will we see a brutal race for the greatest possible connectedness? Or will conectivity bring peace, reduce the number of classic warfare? What will be the role of the West in this competition, and how much will the Belt and Road initiatives mean? Will nation-states fade away in favor of tribalism?
A Tale of Two Monsters and Four Elements: Variations of Carl Schmitt and the current global crisis
We have a class of scientific technocrats directing the work of a class of politicians without honour, who utterly subordinate everyone else. Only a spiritual revolution will save us now
India is, and will be a non-aligned power in the New Cold War
India is a non-aligned power; this move not only protects its own varied relations (as seen with India-Russia ties and even India-China bilateral) but also allows it to provide guidance and support to smaller economies in Asia and the Indo-Pacific
The Sino-Russian relationship should not be seen as an alliance of revisionist powers
Chinese do not feel comfortable with the seemingly endless “endism” produced by Western intellectual elites, be it Fukuyamanian “end of history” at the end of the Cold War, or the recent variant of the “end” of the so-called liberal international order (LIO)